After working with the hundred-squares, ten-bars, and thousand-cubes to figure out how to add polynomials, we borrowed the binomial and trinomial cubes to practice multiplying out factors. It’s a physical way of showing factor multiplication.
Binomial Square
You can first look at the binomial cube in two-dimensions as a binomial square by just finding the area of the top layer of four blocks.
If you label the length of the side of the red block, a, and the length of the blue block, b, you can calculate the areas of the individual pieces simply by multiplying their lengths times their widths.
Adding up the individual areas you get the area of the entire square:
However, there is another way.
If you recognize that the length of each side of the entire square is equal to (a+b).
Then the total area is going to be total length (a+b) times the total width (a+b):
which simplifies to give the same result as adding up the individual areas:
The Binomial Cube
We can do the same thing using the entire cube by recognizing that the volume of the cube is the length times width times the depth, and all of these dimensions are the same: (a+b).
Now the students can go through the same process of multiplying out the factors, and can check their work be seeing if they get the same number of pieces (and dimensions) as the physical cube.
When a photon of light hits an atom three things can happen: it can bounce off; it can pass through as if nothing had happened; or it be absorbed. Which one happens depends on the energy of the light, and which atom it is hitting. Hydrogen will absorb different energies from helium.
The interesting thing is that each atom will only absorb photons with exactly the right energy. You see, when the light hits the atom, the atom will only absorb it if it can use it to bump an electron up an electron shell.
An oxygen atom, for example, has eight electrons, but these fit into two different electron shells. The innermost shell can only hold two electrons, so the other six go into the second shell (which can take a maximum of 8). This is the “ground state” of the atom, because it takes the least amount of energy to keep the electrons in place.
However, if the atom gets hit by just enough energy, one of the electrons can be bumped up into a higher shell. The atom will be “excited” and “want” the electron to drop back down to the lower shell.
And when the electron drops back, it will release the exact same amount of energy that it took to move it up a shell in the first place.
For hydrogen, the energy to bump up an electron from its first to its second electron shell comes only from light with a wavelength of 1216 x 10-10m (see here for how to calculate). This is in the ultraviolet range, which we can’t see with the naked eye.
However, the energy absorbed and released when the electron moves between the second and fourth shells is 6564 x 10-10m, which is in the visible range. In fact, it’s the red line on the right side of the emission spectrum shown at the top of the page.
Since this emission signature is unique for each element, looking at the colors of other stars, or the tops of the atmospheres of other planets, is a good way of identifying the elements in them. You can also do flame tests to identify different elements.
The University of Oregon has an excellent little Flash application that shows the absorption spectrum of most of the elements in the periodic table (NOTE that the wavelengths they give are in Angstroms (Å) which are 1×10-10m; or tenths of a nanometer (nm)).
Equations
The wavelength of light emitted for the movement of an electron between the electron shells of a hydrogen atom is given by the Rydberg formula:
where:
= wavelength of the light in a vacuum
= Rydberg constant (1.1×107 m-1)
and are the electron shell numbers (the innermost shell is 1, the next shell is 2 etc.)
I sent a couple of my algebra students down to the pre-Kindergarten classroom to burrow one of their Montessori works. They were having a little trouble adding polynomials, and the use of manipulatives really helped.
The basic idea is that when you add something like:
you can’t add a n3 term to a n2 or a n term. You only combine the terms with the same degree (and same variables). So the equation above becomes:
which simplifies to:
The kids actually enjoyed the chance to run downstairs to burrow the materials from their old pre-K teacher (and weren’t they quite good about returning the materials when they were done with them).
And it clarifies a lot of misconceptions when you can clearly see that that you just can’t add a thousand cube to a ten bar — it just doesn’t work.
There are some things in this world that we are willing to trade, things that we can put a dollar value on, but there are other things — call them sacred things — values and beliefs that just don’t register on any monetary scale. New research (summarized by Keim, 2012) emphasizes this intuitive understanding, by showing that different part of the brain are used to evaluate these two different types of things.
[W]hen people didn’t sell out their principles, it wasn’t because the price wasn’t right. It just seemed wrong. “There’s one bucket of things that are utilitarian, and another bucket of categorical things,” [neuroscientist Greg Berns] said. “If it’s a sacred value to you, then you can’t even conceive of it in a cost-benefit framework.”
Some of the biggest implications of this work has to do with economics. The traditional, rational view has been that people evaluate everything by comparing the costs versus the benefits. When economists take that rational view of human behavior into other fields, there is a strong sense of overreach (see Freakonomics).
The growing research into behavioral economics, on the other hand, is making a spirited effort grapple with the irrationality of human behavior, much of which probably stems from these two different value systems (sacred vs. cost/benefit). While it’s not exactly the same thing, Dan Ariely‘s books are a good, popular compilation of observations and anecdotes that highlight how people’s irrational behavior extends even into the marketplace.
We’re talking about light and sound waves in physics at the moment, and NPR’s Morning Edition just had a great article on how the enormous, ultra-precise, mirrors that are used in large telescopes are made.
Astronomical observatories tend to use mirrors instead of lenses in their telescopes, largely because if you make lenses too big they tend to sag in the middle, while you can support a mirror all across the back, and because you have to make a lens perfect all the way through for it to work correctly, but only have to make one perfect surface for a parabolic mirror.
ScienceClarified has a great summary of the history of the Hubble Space telescope, that includes all the trouble NASA went through trying to fix it when they realized it was not quite perfect.
In addition, it’s interesting to note that you can also make a parabolic surface on a liquid by spinning it, resulting in liquid telescope mirrors .
The Guardian asked six major newspapers from across Europe about their local stereotypes of the other countries: Great Britain, France, Italy, Spain, Poland, and Germany. Then they asked six “cultural commentators” from those countries to respond. It’s quite an interesting read.
Aerial robots are used to construct a tower. It’s pretty awesome, especially when you note that the robots don’t collide with each other, and plug themselves in when they realize they’re running out of power.
My students asked me this question the other day, and while slapping together an animation of electromagnetic induction I gave it some thought.
This program itself is really simple. It took about 15 minutes.
But that’s not counting the half hour I spent searching the web for an image I could use to illustrate magnetic induction and not finding one I could use.
Nor does it count the four hours I spent after I got the animation working to get the program to take screen captures automatically. Of course, I must admit that figuring out the screen captures would have gone a lot quicker if I’d not had to rebuild all my permissions on my hard drive (I’d recently reformatted it), and reinstall ImageMagick and gifsicle to take the screen captures and make animations.