How well does extrinsic motivation help us perform? NPR recently had another interesting interview with Dan Ariely where he talked about how rewards, cash bonuses in this case, affect performance.
It turns out that while bonuses increase people’s desire to perform better, people actually perform worse, probably because of the increased stress.
I’m always a little suspicious of things titled as “for adolescents” or similar, because they tend to satisfy someone’s memory of being young and don’t necessarily provide what adolescents actually need. Of course I’m guilty of the same bias but I do take some effort be aware and to be critical of my own choices because of it. That said, I listened to a couple of poems from Elise Paschen’s compilation of poetry for adolescents, “Poetry Speaks Who I Am: Poems of Discovery, Inspiration, Independence and Everything Else” on NPR’s Morning Edition today and some of them are pretty good.
The poetry anthology comes with a CD, and Paschen reads a few on the program. She also goes on to talk about the poems a little, giving a good example about how to respond to poetry. The first poem they discuss on the program, Rita Dove’s Flash Cards, though written from the point of view of a younger student, is quite good. There are also a couple of poems on the NPR article.
Since we’re still having poetry presentations in the morning I think it would be useful to play part of this interview to help shape the discussion.
We all love the Schoolhouse Rock video, “How a bill becomes a law” but with the recent passage of the health care bill we are reminded that the theory can get a little more nuanced in practice. NPR’s On The Media has an updated version.
Some argue that despite all the ongoing wars and conflicts in the world today, the trajectory of history is toward expanding human rights. And the people working to bring dictators and human rights violators to account, are at the forefront of this argument.
Baltasar Garzon (from Wikipedia).
One of my small groups chose to do a project on Baltasar Garzón as a defender of human rights. Their presentation brought up the fascinating concept of “sovereign immunity”, the idea that the legal government of a country cannot commit a crime, and they cannot be sued or charged in court for anything they do. The idea comes from the historical belief that, by definition, the king (or queen) can do no wrong.
Garzón, a judge in Spain, has also been pushing the limits of the concept of “universal jurisdiction”, by trying to bring to trial leaders from other countries who have been accused of violating human rights by torturing their citizens and committing genocide. People he’s investigating include former dictators from Argentina and, most famously, Chile. What makes it more pertinent right now is that he’s also investigating members of the recent Bush Administration (former attorney general, Alberto Gonzales; lawyer John Yoo, the infamous author of the memos approving torture, and four others).
Garzón is an idealist, which appeals kids who see the world most often in black and white:
It has always amazed me that politicians keep writing international conventions. But then when the time comes to apply one of those laws that have been ratified, they say “the problem is, economic stability, or political stability, could be threatened by the application of this rule.” So what’s the point? Do we ratify the laws in order to apply them or not? – Baltasar Garzón in interview reported in Speak Truth to Power.
Because of the presentation on Garzón yesterday, my ears perked up this morning when I heard the words “sovereign immunity” on the radio. Nina Totenberg reported on a current Supreme Court case where victims of the military dictatorship in Somalia who are living in the US are suing the former prime minister of the Barre dictatorship who is also now living in the US. It is a fascinating case, with broad implications for the prosecution of human rights violators around the world.
In going over the timeline of human rights today, we realized that it did not have a card for the civil rights struggle of the 1950’s and 60’s. One of the key events that middle school students should be able to relate to is the desegregation of Central High School in Little Rock Arkansas. Imagine having to have troops escort you into school. Imagine having to endure racial taunts every day when you were only one of nine African American students in the entire school.
The Eisenhower Presidential Library has some of the primary documents related to the events. They give a vivid account of the events from the perspective of what the president saw.
