The introduction of snakes to Guam has reverberated through the ecosystem.
Accidentally introduced to the island in the 1940s, the snake decimated the island’s native bird species in one of the most infamous ecological disasters from an invasive species.
By the 1980s, 10 of 12 native bird species had been wiped out.
Since many birds consume spiders, compete with spiders for insect prey and utilize spider webs in their nests, their loss has led to a spider explosion on the island, researchers said.
Note (for the Algebra students): The scientific article includes a nice box and whisker plot showing how many more spiderwebs there are on Guam compared to other islands.
Number of spider webs on different islands. Guam is the only island shown that has had a severe reduction in birds. Image from Rogers et al., 2012.
Changing colors of universal indicator show how blowing bubbles acidifies water (light green-second beaker) from neutral pH (dark green-third beaker) standard. For comparison, the first beaker (red) is acidified while the last beaker (blue) is made alkaline.
CO2 + H2O —-> H2CO3
This useful little reaction, where carbon dioxide reacts with water to produce carbonic acid, came up in my middle school class when we talked about respiration, it’ll come up soon in environmental science with the effects of carbon dioxide on the oceans (acidification), and it offers the opportunity to discuss pH and balancing chemical reactions in chemistry.
The middle school class did the neat little experiment where students blow bubbles in water (through a straw), and the carbon dioxide in their breath reacts with the water to slightly acidify it. A little universal pH indicator in the water (or even cabbage juice indicator) shows the acidification pretty well if you make sure to keep a standard nearby so students can see the change in color.
The fact that the CO2 in your breath is enough to acidify water begs the question — which was asked — how much of the air you exhale is carbon dioxide? According to the Oak Ridge Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center’s FAQ page, it’s concentration is about 3.7% by volume. Which is a lot more than the 0.04% average of the atmosphere.
Of course if you really want to talk about the pH you need to get into the acid equilibrium and the dissociation of the carbonic acid to produce H+ ions; you can get the these details here.
My students are researching the organisms they collected from the creek, and I was outlining the types of information I wanted them to find. We were talking about how many animals have seasonal reproductive cycles, and I pointed out that plants flower seasonally as well. One of my students put two and two together and came up with something close to a whole number: “You mean to say that flowers are … some sort of … creepy … sexual things?”
Microbe collected from the TFS Creek on 9/10/2012. Possibly a species of desmid.
The TFS campus has an excellent ecological gradient. It starts at the hydrologic base-level, with the small, usually permanent, creek in the valley. Then the landscape ranges up, past a narrow but dense riparian zone to the anthropomorphic campus, then up a shrub-covered hillslope that transitions abruptly into the advancing, mature, forest of the hill-top nature reserve. My environmental science class is taking advantage of our geographic proximity by doing a year-long ecological survey project.
We’ve just started, this fall, on the stream and riparian zone. I asked each of them to identify and do some research on a single organism. They all chose some type of macro-organism: spiders, crayfish, flowering herbs (note: just because it’s called an herb does not mean it’s edible), mushrooms, and more. There’s quite a bit of biodiversity down there, although, with the creek just now coming back from our particularly dry summer, the fish are few and far between.
Close-up view of the micro-organism under 1000x magnification (oil immersion lens).
Since no-one chose to look for micro-organisms — even though I did suggest they were an important part of the ecology — I decided do so myself.
I found a loosely held together patch of algae, which I collected with the hope that it would harbor its own little microscopic ecological system. And it did. There were amoebas zipping around, the filamentous algae itself, and these little organisms that I can’t quite identify yet. T
hey may be desimids, but I’m not sure. They look slightly green, but I can’t see any clear chloroplasts (like these). I’ll try staining them tomorrow to see if I can identify any organelles.
A terrible picture "showing" the patch of fillamentous algae I collected from the creek.
Groundwater tends to be a common property resource. In places like Yemen, where ownership rights are not clearly defined it tends to be overexploited. So much so, that they’re looking at running out within the next 10 years. Peter Salisbury has an article in Foreign Policy.
Most potable water in Yemen is produced from a series of deep underground aquifers using electric and diesel-powered pumps. Some of these pumps are run by the government, but many more are run by private companies, most of them unlicensed and unregulated. Because of this, it is nigh on impossible to control the volume of water produced. By some (conservative) estimates, about 250 million cubic meters of water are produced from the Sanaa basin every year, 80 percent of which is non-renewable. In recent years, the businessmen who produce the water have had to drill ever-deeper wells and use increasingly powerful pumps to get the region’s dwindling water reserves out of the ground.
What if the entire world population lived like the people in Bangladesh? The amount of land to produce the resources we’d need would take up most of Asia and some of Africa. On the other hand, if we lived like the people in the UAE we’d need 5.4 Earths to support us sustainably. That’s the result of Mathis Wackernagel’s work (Wackernagel, 2006) comparing resource availability to resource demand. Tim De Chant put this data into graphical form:
Ecological footprints needed to support the world population if everyone used resources at the rate of these different countries. Image by Tim De Chant, based on data from Wacknagel (2006).
I showed this image in Environmental Science class today when we talked about ecological footprints, as well as the one showing how much space the world population of seven billion would take up if everyone lived in one big city with the same density of a few different cities (Paris, New York, Houston etc.).
Wacknagel’s original article also includes this useful table of data for different countries that I think I’ll try to get a student to put into bar graph for a project or presentation.
Evidence is mounting that fish populations won’t necessarily recover even if overfishing stops. Fishing may be such a powerful evolutionary force that we are running up a Darwinian debt for future generations.
Darwinian Debt. That’s the elegant phrase Natasha Loder (2006) uses to describe the observation that human pressure on the environment — fishing in this particular example — has forced evolutionary changes that are not soon reversed.
Fishermen prefer to catch larger fish, depleting the population of older fish, and allowing smaller fish to successfully reproduce. Over a period of years this artificial selection — as opposed to natural selection — gives rise to new generations of fish that are permanently smaller than they used to be. And the fisheries find it hard to recover even after decades (Swain, 2007):
Populations where large fish were selectively harvested (as in most fisheries) displayed substantial declines in fecundity, egg volume, larval size at hatch, larval viability, larval growth rates, food consumption rate and conversion efficiency, vertebral number, and willingness to forage. These genetically based changes in numerous traits generally reduce the capacity for population recovery.
