Anheuser-Busch and the industrial revolution

Fermentation vats.

Why take a group of middle schoolers on a tour of the Anheuser-Busch factory? After all, no one will be trying any samples and the main point of the museum and the tour itself is to make people feel good about the company and buy more of its products. Which would be beer.

Rail track leading into the brewery.

The answer is that the history of the company ties directly into the history of the industrial revolution in the U.S.. Its large scale industrial process was made possible by the serendipitous German immigration into St. Louis in the late 1800’s. Just then the expansion of grain farming in the mid-west and the railroads could supply the raw materials for beer on a massive scale. New assembly lines and automation could efficiently process these inputs, resulting in large scale production. Successes bred new inventions, with the company retaining the services of Rudolph Diesel to introduce his engine to the U.S..

Assembly line producing hundreds of bottles a minute with only five workers.

The survival of the company during prohibition (1920-1933) was another point of interest. Anheuser-Busch survived by diversifying from its core business, making non-alcoholic drinks and selling baker’s yeast among other things. At the end of prohibition, Anheuser-Busch was the only large brewer left in the city St. Louis.

Barley.

We also saw a bit of chemistry during the tour. The breakdown of complex starches into sugars as part of the fermentation process is a basic example of organic chemistry in action (polymers –> monomers). Light beer, for example, is kept in the tanks longer so that more of the starches are broken down into simple sugars. There were even a couple of big models of barley grains and hops buds showing their parts, that tie in to our life-science lessons next year.

First encounter with the barrage of advertising.

Even the surfeit of advertising could be used to advantage; the first thing inside the door of the museum is a television playing Anheuser-Busch’s most successful commercials. We’ve been discussing propaganda all year, so the students were somewhat inoculated to the barrage of feel-good messages, and we specifically discussed this in our post-tour group meeting.

Our tour guides were great. Informative, friendly and willing to answer questions, I particularly appreciated that they joined us in our group discussion after the tour and answered the questions that came up as best they could.

This tour exceeded my expectations.

Child labor in the early 20th century

Maud Cheek one of the young spinners in the Drayton Mill, Spartenberg sic, S.C., runs 7 sides. Worked in another mill before she came here. Maud's two sisters Blanche and Grace all in the spinning room with her. Father did not appear to be working. Location: Spartanburg, South Carolina. (Image by Lewis Wickes Hine, from the Library of Congress)

Considering child labor today, it’s worth noting how extensive it was in the past. The Library of Congress is an excellent source for public domain images, and has available the amazing photographs of child workers taken by Lewis Wickles Hine for the National Child Labor Committee.

Child labor in the U.S.

Child labor comes up when we talk about the industrial revolution. When we discuss its modern incarnations, we usually think about sweatshops in the developing world. Human Rights Watch has a poignant video about child labor in the United States today. Their interviews with migrant farmer children, who are the same age as our middle-schoolers, are heartbreaking.

Cattle drives

pre-European vegetation of the U.S. (from Oak Ridge National Laboratory).

The story of cattle drives and the railroads also has a lot to do with the geography of natural resources in the United States. A few good references:

Blogging the industrial revolution

Map of population and railroads in 1850 (from Emerson Kent.com)

Not for the faint of heart, but interesting non-the-less, the Economic History blog has a nice series of posts on articles studying the Industrial Revolution.

This blog summarizes papers published on Economic History in major academic journals. The industrial revolution series includes an interesting post on why the industrial revolution happened in the North and not the South. An article by Earle and Ronald (1980) argues that it was because of the monoculture agriculture (just one crop) in the north, cheap labour was available for industry.