The Physics of Flight: World Bird Sanctuary in St. Louis

wild-bird-sanct-4352b — Bird of Prey -- at the World Bird Sanctuary.

A discussion of the physics of flight, interspersed with birds of prey swooping just centimeters from the tops of your head, made for a captivating presentation on avian aerodynamics by the people at the World Bird Sanctuary that’s just west of St. Louis.

Lift

The presentation started with the forces involved in flight (thrust, lift, drag and gravity). In particular, they focused on lift, talking about the shape of the wings and how airfoils work: the air moves faster over the top of the wind, reducing the air pressure at the top, generating lift.

airfoil — The shape of a bird's wing, and its angle to the horizontal, generates lift. Image adapted from Wikipedia User:Kraaiennest.

Then we had a demonstration of wings in flight.

wild-bird-sanct-4357b — Terror from the air.

We met a kestrel, one of the fastest birds, and one of the few birds of prey that can hover.

Next was a barn owl. They’re getting pretty rare in the mid-continent because we’re losing all the barns.

Interestingly, barn owls’ excellent night vision comes from very good optics of their eyes, but does not extend into the infrared wavelenghts.

wild-bird-sanct-o4-350 — Barn owl in flight.

Finally, we met a vulture, and learned: why they have no feathers on their heads (internal organs, like hearts and livers, are tasty); about their ability to projectile vomit (for defense); and their use of thermal convection for flying.

Convection-snapshot — The ground warms when it absorbs sunlight (e.g. parking lots in summer) and in turn warm the air near the ground. Hot air rises, creating a convection current, or thermal, that the vultures use to gain height.

The Sanctuary does a great presentation, that really worth the visit.

Gravitational and Electric Fields

Astronaut Don Pettit makes water droplets orbit a knitting needle. Instead of gravity, the attractive force that holds the water droplets in orbit is generated by the static electric charge on the knitting needle and on the water droplet. This works because gravity and electromagnetic forces follow similar rules (inverse square laws).

See more of his space-based experiments on Science off the Sphere on Physics Central.

Legitimacy Must be Earned, For Teachers and Even for Parents

My students always have the right to expect a reasonable answer from me to their questions. Even the hard ones that don’t have to do with the subject at hand: things like, “why do I have to learn this, I’m not going to be an engineer?” It’s part of authoritative (not authoritarian) teaching. Students have a right to wonder why they’re doing what they’re doing. It keeps me on my toes; considering if there’s a good reason for doing what we’re doing. It helps them to see how to make a rational argument — and sets, by implication, a high bar for the quality of their arguments. I also figure that if I’m respectful to them, and share my reasoning, they’re more likely to go with my decisions voluntarily, even if they don’t particularly like them.

And it seems that same approach also applies to parenting. A study (Trinkner et al., 2012) finds that adolescents respect and defer to their parents only to the extent that they see their parents as being fair, considerate and respectful of them. When kids believe that their parents’ decisions are legitimate, they are more likely to obey them. Conversely,

… authoritarian parenting was negatively associated with parental legitimacy.

— (Trinkner et al., 2012): Don’t trust anyone over 30: Parental legitimacy as a mediator between parenting style and changes in delinquent behavior over time, in Journal of Adolescence.

The way to earn legitimacy is by being authoritative not authoritarian (as described by Baumrind’s parenting styles).

… authoritative parents are warm and responsive, providing their children with affection and support in their explorations and pursuit of interests. These parents have high maturity demands (e.g., expectations for achievement) for their children but foster these [through] communication, induction (i.e., explanations of their behavior), and encouragement of independence. For example, when socializing their children (e.g., to do well in school), these parents might provide their children with a rationale for their actions and priorities (e.g., “it will allow you to succeed as an adult.”). Authoritative parents score high on measures of warmth and responsiveness and high on measures of control and maturity demands…

— Spera, 2005, A Review of the Relationship Among Parenting Practices, Parenting Styles, and Adolescent School Achievement in Educational Psychology Review.

It also turns out that authoritarian, “because I told you to” parents were most likely to have delinquent, disobedient kids.

Phases of the Moon

BadAstronomer has posted an awesome video of the moon going through its phases for an entire year.

(it’s particularly awesome in full screen and HD.)

The video is based off a NASA webpage that will generate a picture of the moon for any hour, of any day, in the year of 2012 (and only if you’re in the northern hemisphere near the equator, but close enough). They have lots more videos and images.

Interestingly, the images are all computer generated — they’re not real photos. They are based on high-resolution images and topography data taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.

Everything You (N)ever Wanted to Know About Parabolas

So that my students could more easily check their answers graphically, I put together a page with a more complete analysis of parabolas (click this link for more details).

[inline]

Analyzing Parabolas

Standard Form	Vertex Form
`y = a x² + b x + c`	`y = a (x – h)² + k`
y = x² + x +	y = ( x – ) ² +

Intercepts:	Vertex:
Focus:	Directrix:	Axis:

Solution by Factoring:

y = x² x

[script type=”text/javascript”]
var width=500;
var height=500;
var xrange=10;
var yrange=10;

mx = width/(2.0*xrange);
bx = width/2.0;
my = -height/(2.0*yrange);
by = height/2.0;

function draw_9239(ctx, polys) {
t_9239=t_9239+dt_9239;
//ctx.fillText (“t=”+t, xp(5), yp(5));
ctx.clearRect(0,0,width,height);

polys[0].drawAxes(ctx);
ctx.lineWidth=2;
polys[0].draw(ctx);

polys[0].write_eqn2(ctx);

//polys[0].y_intercepts(ctx);
//write intercepts on graph

// SHOW VERTEX
if (show_vertex_ctrl_9239.checked==true) {
polys[0].draw_vertex(ctx);
document.getElementById(‘vertex_pos_9239’).innerHTML = “(“+polys_9239[0].vertex.x.toPrecision(2)+ ” , “+polys_9239[0].vertex.y.toPrecision(2)+ ” )”;
} else { document.getElementById(‘vertex_pos_9239’).innerHTML = “”;}

// SHOW FOCUS
if (show_focus_ctrl_9239.checked==true) {
polys[0].draw_focus(ctx);
document.getElementById(‘focus_pos_9239’).innerHTML = “(“+polys_9239[0].focus.x.toPrecision(2)+ ” , “+polys_9239[0].focus.y.toPrecision(2)+ ” )”;
} else { document.getElementById(‘focus_pos_9239’).innerHTML = “”;}

// SHOW DIRECTRIX
if (show_directrix_ctrl_9239.checked==true) {
polys[0].draw_directrix(ctx);
document.getElementById(‘directrix_pos_9239’).innerHTML = polys[0].directrix.get_eqn2(“y”,”x”,”html”);

polys[0].directrix.write_eqn2(ctx, polys[0].directrix.get_eqn2(“directrix: y”));
} else { document.getElementById(‘directrix_pos_9239’).innerHTML = “”;}

// SHOW AXIS
if (show_axis_ctrl_9239.checked==true) {
polys[0].draw_parabola_axis(ctx);
document.getElementById(‘axis_pos_9239’).innerHTML = “x = “+polys[0].vertex.x.toPrecision(2);
}

//SHOW INTERCEPTS
ctx.textAlign=”center”;
if (show_intercepts_ctrl_9239.checked==true) {
polys[0].x_intercepts(ctx);
ctx.fillText (‘x intercepts: (when y=0)’, xp(6), yp(8));
//ctx.fillText (‘intercepts=’+polys[0].x_intcpts.length, xp(5), yp(-5));
if (polys[0].order == 2) {
if (polys[0].x_intcpts.length > 0) {
line = “0 = “;
for (var i=0; i 0.0) { sign=”-“;} else {sign=”+”;}
line = line + “(x “+sign+” “+ Math.abs(polys[0].x_intcpts[i].toPrecision(2))+ “)”;
}
ctx.fillText (line, xp(6), yp(7));
for (var i=0; i 0) {
for (var i=0; i2 “+polys[0].bsign+” “+Math.abs(polys[0].b.toPrecision(2))+” x “+ polys[0].csign+” “+Math.abs(polys[0].c.toPrecision(2))+”

“;

solution = solution + ‘Factoring: ‘;

if (polys[0].x_intcpts.length > 0) {
solution = solution + ‘0 = ‘;
for (var i=0; i 0.0) { sign=”-“;} else {sign=”+”;}
solution = solution + “(x “+sign+” “+ Math.abs(polys[0].x_intcpts[i].toPrecision(2))+ “)”;
}
solution = solution + ‘

‘;
solution = solution + ‘Set each factor equal to zero:
‘;
for (var i=0; i 0.0) { sign=”-“;} else {sign=”+”;}
solution = solution + “x “+sign+” “+ Math.abs(polys[0].x_intcpts[i].toPrecision(2))+ ” = 0 “;
}
solution = solution + ‘

and solve for x:
‘;
for (var i=0; i‘;
}
document.getElementById(‘equation_9239’).innerHTML = solution;
}

else if (polys[0].order == 1) {
solution = solution + ‘
‘;
solution = solution + “y = “+” “+Math.abs(polys[0].b.toPrecision(2))+” x “+ polys[0].csign+” “+Math.abs(polys[0].c.toPrecision(2))+”

“;
solution = solution + ‘

Set y=0 and solve for x:
‘;
solution = solution + ” 0 = “+” “+Math.abs(polys[0].b.toPrecision(2))+” x “+ polys[0].csign+” “+Math.abs(polys[0].c.toPrecision(2))+”

“;
solution = solution + ‘ ‘;
solution = solution + (-1.0*polys[0].c).toPrecision(2) +” = “+” “+Math.abs(polys[0].b.toPrecision(2))+” x “+”

“;
solution = solution + ‘ ‘;
solution = solution + (-1.0*polys[0].c).toPrecision(2)+”/”+polys[0].b.toPrecision(2)+” = “+” x “+”

“;
solution = solution + ‘ ‘;
solution = solution + “x = “+ (-1.0*polys[0].c/polys[0].b).toPrecision(4)+”

“;

document.getElementById(‘equation_9239’).innerHTML = solution;
}

}

function update_form_9239 () {
a_coeff_9239.value = polys_9239[0].a+””;
b_coeff_9239.value = polys_9239[0].b+””;
c_coeff_9239.value = polys_9239[0].c+””;

av_coeff_9239.value = polys_9239[0].a+””;
hv_coeff_9239.value = polys_9239[0].h+””;
kv_coeff_9239.value = polys_9239[0].k+””;

}

//init_mouse();

var c_9239=document.getElementById(“myCanvas_9239”);
var ctx_9239=c_9239.getContext(“2d”);

var change = 0.0001;

function create_lines_9239 () {
//draw line
//document.write(“hello world! “);
var polys = [];
polys.push(addPoly(1,6, 5));

// polys.push(addPoly(0.25, 1, 0));
// polys[1].color = ‘#8C8’;

return polys;
}

var polys_9239 = create_lines_9239();

var x1=xp(-10);
var y1=yp(1);
var x2=xp(10);
var y2=yp(1);
var dc_9239=0.05;

var t_9239 = 0;
var dt_9239 = 100;
//end_ct = 0;
var st_pt_x_9239 = 2;
var st_pt_y_9239 = 1;
var show_vertex_9239 = 1; //1 to show vertex on startup
var show_focus_9239 = 1; // 1 to show the focus
var show_intercepts_9239 = 1; // 1 to show the intercepts
var show_directrix_9239 = 1; // 1 to show the directrix
var show_axis_9239 = 1; //1 to show the axis of the parabola

var move_dir_9239 = 1.0; // 1 for up

//document.getElementById(‘comment_spot’).innerHTML = polys_9239[0].a+” “+polys_9239[0].b+” “+polys_9239[0].c+” : “+polys_9239[0].h+” “+polys_9239[0].k+” “;

//standard form
var a_coeff_9239 = document.getElementById(“a_coeff_9239”);
var b_coeff_9239 = document.getElementById(“b_coeff_9239”);
var c_coeff_9239 = document.getElementById(“c_coeff_9239”);

//vertex form
var av_coeff_9239 = document.getElementById(“av_coeff_9239”);
var hv_coeff_9239 = document.getElementById(“hv_coeff_9239”);
var kv_coeff_9239 = document.getElementById(“kv_coeff_9239”);

//options
var show_vertex_ctrl_9239 = document.getElementById(“show_vertex_9239”);
if (show_vertex_9239 == 0) {show_vertex_ctrl_9239.checked=false;
} else {show_vertex_ctrl_9239.checked=true;}

var show_focus_ctrl_9239 = document.getElementById(“show_focus_9239”);
if (show_focus_9239 == 0) {show_focus_ctrl_9239.checked=false;
} else {show_focus_ctrl_9239.checked=true;}

var show_intercepts_ctrl_9239 = document.getElementById(“show_intercepts_9239”);
if (show_intercepts_9239 == 0) {show_intercepts_ctrl_9239.checked=false;
} else {show_intercepts_ctrl_9239.checked=true;}

var show_directrix_ctrl_9239 = document.getElementById(“show_directrix_9239”);
if (show_directrix_9239 == 0) {show_directrix_ctrl_9239.checked=false;
} else {show_directrix_ctrl_9239.checked=true;}

var show_axis_ctrl_9239 = document.getElementById(“show_axis_9239”);
if (show_axis_9239 == 0) {show_axis_ctrl_9239.checked=false;
} else {show_axis_ctrl_9239.checked=true;}

update_form_9239();

//document.write(“test= “+c_coeff_9239.value+” “+polys_9239[0].c);
setInterval(“draw_9239(ctx_9239, polys_9239)”, dt_9239);

a_coeff_9239.onchange = function() {
//polys_9239[0].a = parseFloat(this.value);
polys_9239[0].set_a(parseFloat(this.value));
polys_9239[0].update_vertex_form_parabola();
update_form_9239();
}
b_coeff_9239.onchange = function() {
//polys_9239[0].b = parseFloat(this.value);
polys_9239[0].set_b(parseFloat(this.value));
polys_9239[0].update_vertex_form_parabola();
update_form_9239();
}
c_coeff_9239.onchange = function() {
//polys_9239[0].c = parseFloat(this.value);
polys_9239[0].set_c(parseFloat(this.value));
polys_9239[0].update_vertex_form_parabola();
update_form_9239();
}

av_coeff_9239.onchange = function() {
//polys_9239[0].a = parseFloat(this.value);
polys_9239[0].set_a(parseFloat(this.value));
polys_9239[0].update_standard_form_parabola();
update_form_9239();
}

hv_coeff_9239.onchange = function() {
polys_9239[0].h = parseFloat(this.value);
polys_9239[0].update_standard_form_parabola();
polys_9239[0].set_order()
update_form_9239();
}

kv_coeff_9239.onchange = function() {
polys_9239[0].k = parseFloat(this.value);
polys_9239[0].update_standard_form_parabola();
polys_9239[0].set_order()
update_form_9239();
}

//draw_9239();
//document.write(“x”+x2+”x”);
//ctx_9239.fillText (“n=”, xp(5), yp(5));

[/script]

[/inline]

Converting the forms

The key relationships are the ones to convert from the standard form of the parabolic equation:

$y = a x^2 + b x + c$

(1)

to the vertex form:

$y = a (x - h)^2 + k$

(2)

If you multiply out the vertex equation form you get:

y = a x² – 2ah x + ah² + k

(3)

When you compare this equation to the standard form of the equation (Equation 1), if you look at the coefficients and the constants, you can see that:

To convert from the vertex to the standard form use:

         $a = a$ (4)

         $b = -2ah$ (5)

         $c = ah^2 + k$ (6)

Going the other way,

To convert from the standard to the vertex form of parabolic equations use:

         $a = a$
(7)

         $h = \frac{-b}{2a}$
(8)

         $k = c - ah^2$
(9)

Although it is sometimes convenient to let k not depend on coefficients from its own equation:

$k = c - \frac{b^2}{4a}$ (10)

The Vertex and the Axis

The nice thing about the vertex form of the equation of the parabola is that if you want the find the coordinates of the vertex of the parabola, they’re right there in the equation.

Specifically, the vertex is located at the point:

$(x_v, y_v) = (h, k)$

(11)

The axis of the parabola is the vertical line going through the vertex, so:

The equation for the axis of a parabola is:

$x = h$

(12)

Focus and Directrix

Finally, it’s important to note that the distance (d) from the vertex of the parabola to its focus is given by:

$d = \frac{1}{4a}$

(13)

Which you can just add d on to the coordinates of the vertex (Equation 11) to get the location of the focus.

$(x_f, y_f) = (x_v, y_v + d)$

(14)

The directrix is just the opposite, vertical distance away, so the equation for the directrix is the equation of the horizontal line at:

$y = y_v + d$

(15)

References

There are already some excellent parabola references out there including:

Wonderful interactive graphs by Murray Bourne.
Nice simple explanations of the different forms of the equations.
More complex explanations from Wolfram Alpha.

Enhancing Creativity Just by Doing Things a Little Bit Differently

When my verbal students complain about having to do diagrams (or vice versa) I try to explain that it’s useful for them to see, and be able to learn from, different points of view. There also a body of research showing that breaking familiar routines enhances creativity.

Actively doing something different, just by changing your routine for example (milk first then cereal instead of the other way around), seems to improve people’s cognitive flexibility (see: Ritter et al., 2011), but you have to do it yourself.

… being exposed to simple unconventional events, such as preparing breakfast in the “wrong” order, increased cognitive flexibility. Furthermore, these effects were found only when people actively participated in the unconventional activities. Just seeing someone else perform the activities was not enough (my emphasis).

— Damian, R., 2012: Why Would Doing Something Unconventionally Make Us More Creative? in Science + Religion Today.

These findings also suggest that greater diversity also promotes creativity — periods of greater immigration have been followed by increases in innovation.

Challenge vs. skill, showing "flow" region. (Image and caption by Wikipedia User:Oliverbeatson).

It also suggest one reason why a little challenge is essential for motivating students to get into the flow zone for learning. People learn more, and become more engaged, when they’re challenged, have to struggle a little, and think differently, while figuring things out for themselves.

An interesting interview with Csikszentmihalyi is here.