Build Your Own Solar System: An Interactive Model

National Geographic has a cute little game that lets you create a two-dimensional solar system, with a sun and some planets, and then simulates the gravitational forces that make them orbit and collide with each other. The pictures are pretty, but I prefer the VPython model of the solar system forming from the nebula.

The models starts off with a cloud of interstellar bodies which are drawn together by gravitational attraction. Every time they collide they merge creating bigger and bigger bodies: the largest of which becomes the sun near the center of the simulation, while the smaller bodies orbit like the planets.

This model also comes out of Sherwood and Chabay’s Physics text, but I’ve adapted it to make it a little more interactives. You can tag along for a ride with one of the orbiting planets, which, since this is 3d, makes for an excellent perspective (see the video). You can also switch the trails on and off so you can see the paths of the planetary bodies, note their orbits and see the deviations from their ideal ellipses that result from the gravitational pull of the other planets.

I’ve found this model to be a great way to introduce topics like the formation of the solar system, gravity, and even climate history (the ice ages over the last 2 million years were largely impelled by changes in the ellipticity of the Earth’s orbit).

National Geographic’s Solar System Builder is here.

Mapping Internet Space

A map of the internet from the Opte Project.

The Opte Project has produced a number of excellent maps of the internet. There is a profound beauty in the immensity of the interconnections that’s reminiscent of the suffusion of stars that can be seen in Milky Way on a dark night on an isolated beach. Unfortunately, their website seems to have not been updated since 2005.

Signs of Water on Mars?

Water is necessary for life as we know it, which is why the search for life on other planets and moons in the solar system has been focused first of all on finding water. NASA now reports signs of water on Mars. Salty water perhaps, and even now there is no direct evidence that it is water and not some other fluid, but this is the first evidence of there being liquid water on Mars today.

The video above explains, and the BBC has a good article.

Appropriate Technology: Innovation with Light

Not a lot of light penetrates the galvanized steel roofs that are ubiquitous in slums around the world. Alfredo Moser came up with one ridiculously cheap solution (via the World Social Forum, 2011).

While this the kind of cheap, elegant solution I would go for in a heartbeat, I’m pretty sure my wife would veto. For the more stylistically conscious – and for people with a bit more money in their pockets – there are $2.00 LED lights advocated by The Appropriate Technology Collaborative (ATC). A lot of people in dire poverty live in the slums, but that’s not the case for everyone.

The ATC’s seems to focus on projects designed by university students and implemented in the third world. If they work, the designs are published with a Creative Commons license so that other Non Governmental Organizations (NGO’s) that work in poorer countries can use and distribute them. Their blog has a lot of good information. And, there’s also the Global Bucket project that I’m still keeping an eye on.

Making Text Easier to Read

Christian Boer, who is dyslexic, has come up with a new font designed to make text easier for dyslexics to read. There are a number of changes to the letters themselves, such as making the bottoms heavier, enlarging the openings, and making similar letters look more different. But, Boer’s website also offers advice on how to lay out text: separate paragraphs with space; avoid right justification; use columns instead of having text across the entire page, and so on.

Unfortunately, the Dyslexie font is not yet available in the U.S..

When I was choosing the layout for this blog, I was aiming for something that would be easy and enjoyable for me to read; I tend to be a little picky about my reading and writing environment. Interestingly, many of my own preferences align well with the ones noted above, but there seem to be a number of improvements I can still make to improve readability for everyone. Abigail Marshall has some additional advice on Web Design for Dyslexic Users.

Why I [believe/don’t believe] in God

Image from the Opte Project.

Andrew Zak Williams asks 30 believers and 30 non-believers why. Their answers do a great job summarizing the major arguments and philosophies of both camps.

Theists assert a number of reasons for their belief: their need for there to be some purpose in the world rather than see the universe as the result of the unguided vagaries of random chance; profound, spiritual experiences in their past; their perception that the beauty of life and the universe must have had some (intelligent) design; and sometimes, an acknowledgment of the need for an element of blind faith.

Atheists, on the other hand, argue the lack of evidence; the often prejudicial, unjust nature of the religions many of them grew up with; and the fact that to recognize one type of religion as correct, often requires its adherents to believe that the others are wrong, leading to the conjecture that none of them are right and they’re all wrong.

Stephen Hawking tries to thread and interesting needle:

I am not claiming there is no God. The scientific account is complete, but it does not predict human behaviour, because there are too many equations to solve.One therefore uses a different model, which can include free will and God.

— Stephen Hawking (2011) in Faith no more (Williams, 2011) in the NewStatesman.

Many adolescents will be encountering these types of questions on their own or through all the bat mitzvah, confirmations and other religious coming-of-age ceremonies adolescents face. Either one of these two articles would be an interesting, if delicate, subject for a Socratic dialogue, especially while studying the history of religions.

[via The Dish]