Those who know me know how much I like the iSeismo app for the iPhone. The phone as a built-in accelerometer and the iSeismo app uses it to show the movement of the phone in three dimensions. The app show three graphs (seismographs), the first two show horizontal motions and the third vertical motion. So, if you put the phone on the table and hit the table the third line should jump up and down.
You can also export the data from the phone (or iPod Touch), and since the phones’ times should be synchronized pretty well, there should be a way to use two phones to triangulate the location of an impact, say on the floor in a room, in the same way that seismologists use seismographs to locate earthquakes. That would make a great demo if it was easy enough to do.
The way sub-atomic particles behave is weird. They don’t fit very well into our everyday experience of the world, but the math and the experimental observations hold up. Chad Orzel has an interesting post on the seven things everyone should know about quantum physics that’s written in language a lay person can understand. This does not make the concepts much easier to grasp intuitively, because, as I mentioned before, quantum mechanics is weird, but it does explain things so we can begin to grasp the big picture of how the universe works. It also helps explain why they’re building the Large Haldron Collider. So though you may not know the answers, you’ll at least have an idea about what it’s about when your students ask.
The beautiful documentary “Cosmic Voyage“, is currently available for free on Hulu. It’s one of those things that sparks the imagination. UPDATE: At least it was on Hulu for a while. If I find it somewhere else I’ll post the link here.
There are lots of interesting interactive wave demonstrations on the web. The particularly interesting ones are the ones that show interference. Some of them make your eyes water. Others make your ears hurt. These simple animations show superposition (constructive and destructive interference) very nicely, but the language is a little advanced.
What I like about Dan Russell’s 2d animations is that they show the wave motion using particles. If you track a single particle with your eye you can see that while the wave moves from one side of the area to the other, the particles just move back and forth in the same general region.
I like this demo because you easily control the wave amplitude and lengths of two waves and it shows how they superimpose.
This animation of wave interference is nice because when you click on the 2d animation it shows the two waves’ effects at the point you’ve chosen as curves. You can choose points to show both constructive and destructive interference.
I discovered science fiction in my early teens but it was always hard to find the great stories in the midst of a lot of drivel. This list of 100 good science fiction and fantasy books seems to be a good start. Most of the books on the list are worthy, but it completely misses John Wyndham (The Chrysalids among others) and Brian Stableford (e.g. War Games). There are also a few that bored me to tears (Bradley’s Avalon) and some that I did not think were very well written (Crichton’s Sphere).
I like science fiction because it tends to deal with some of the big issues that adolescents are facing. Who am I, what’s the future going to be like, what does it mean to be human, what’s my place in society, and of course, wouldn’t it be nice it everyone just disappeared and I had the world all to myself? You also get to tie it in to the Natural World and Social World curriculum.
The Chrysalids is a great example. A post-apocalyptic novel, it looks at, among other things, institutional discrimination, the conflict between science and religion, and evolutionary theory (with it’s darker side eugenics). Wyndham addresses these issues with interesting characters and wonderful, intelligent storytelling (with a heroic journey). I’ve used this book as part of the life sciences curriculum for the tie-in to evolution, and to the history of the Cold War. But I also bring it up when we discuss human rights and discrimination.
The Voyager spacecraft, launched in 1977, are still going and making new discoveries. They are after all the man-made objects that are furthest away from the center of the solar system, beyond the orbit of Pluto, and are now approaching interstellar space.
Where does the solar system end and interstellar space begin? Well, the Sun gives off light, but it also emits a plasma of charged particles (protons and electrons typically) that’s called the solar wind. These charged particles are launched from the Sun pretty fast, but as they get to the edge of the solar system they start to slow down, because the solar system is moving through a magnetic cloud, and, as we all know, charged particles are affected by magnetic fields.
The solar wind, assisted by the Sun’s magnetic field, pushes against the interstellar magnetic cloud, creating a bubble, called the heliosphere (helio=sun, sphere=sphere) that is pretty much the edge of the solar system.
Both Voyager spacecraft are approaching the heliosphere, and we’ve recently discovered that as the solar system moves through the interstellar magnetic cloud, the heliosphere is pushing against the cloud and the cloud is pushing back quite a bit. As a result, the heliosphere is shaped like the bow wave of water around a speeding boat.
It is difficult not to personify these two lonely spacecraft as the get further and further away from home, with no way to get back, but sending signals that tell of their discoveries and ensure their immortality.
400 years ago, on January 7th, Galileo Galilei made his first observations of Jupiter. You can see his notes below. The big circle is Jupiter and the small dots are the specks of light he observed adjacent to the planet. Later observations showed that the specks did not stay in the same place, and lead him to realize that he was seeing moons orbiting the planet.
Galileo used a 33x telescope, which is pretty weak by modern standards, in fact you should be able to see Jupiter and it’s moons with a good pair of binoculars. Since the Catholic church at the time preferred the view that the Earth was the center of the universe, when Galileo published his observation he got into a bit of trouble. In his publication Galileo wrote:
On the 7th day of January in the present year, 1610, in the first hour of the following night, when I was viewing the constellations of the heavons through a telescope, the planet Jupiter presented itself to my view, and as I had prepared for myself a very excellent instrument, I noticed a circumstance which I had never been able to notice before, namely that three little stars, small but very bright, were near the planet; and although I believed them to belong to a number of the fixed stars, yet they made me somewhat wonder, because they seemed to be arranged exactly in a straight line, parallel to the ecliptic, and to be brighter than the rest of the stars, equal to them in magnitude . . .When on January 8th, led by some fatality, I turned again to look at the same part of the heavens, I found a very different state of things, for there were three little stars all west of Jupiter, and nearer together than on the previous night.
Jupiter is much blamed by the poets on account of his irregular loves. Three maidens are especially mentioned as having been clandestinely courted by Jupiter with success. Io, daughter of the River, Inachus, Callisto of Lycaon, Europa of Agenor. Then there was Ganymede, the handsome son of King Tros, whom Jupiter, having taken the form of an eagle, transported to heaven on his back …
For perspective, the image below, of Io’s surface, was taken by NASA’s Galileo spacecraft. Click on the image to get to the high resolution version.
The Galileo Mission website is a great resource about the mission to Jupiter and about Galileo Galilei himself. You can also find out what NASA’s up to with respect to Jupiter here.
Why have I not found this site before, Evil Mad Scientist Laboratories. A place where people will put serious thought, rigorous design and atrocious single-mindedness to create, well I’m not sure I can call it anything other than, “very interesting” projects. Applications of robotics that would make Asimov cry (probably with joy at human ingenuity, probably).
They carefully detail how to create such wonderful projects as: