Since we most commonly talk about radioactive decay in terms of half lives, we can write the equation for the amount of a radioisotope (A) as a function of time (t) as:
where:
To reverse this equation, to find the age of a sample (time) we would have to solve for t:
Take the log of each side (use base 2 because of the half life):
Use the rules of logarithms to simplify:
Now rearrange and solve for t:
So we end up with the equation for time (t):
Now, because this last equation is a linear equation, if we’re careful, we can use it to determine the half life of a radioisotope. As an assignment, find the half life for the decay of the radioisotope given below.
Based on my students’ statistics projects, I automated the method (using R) to calculate the z-score for all the states in the U.S. We used the John Hopkins daily data.
The R functions (test.R) assumes all of the data is in a folder (COVID-19-master/csse_covid_19_data/csse_covid_19_daily_reports_us/), and outputs the graphs to the folder ‘images/zscore/‘ which needs to exist.
Let’s take a look at the summary statistics for the number of confirmed cases, which is in the column labeled “Confirmed”:
> summary(mydata$Confirmed)
Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
317 1964 4499 15347 13302 253060
This shows that the mean is 15, 347 and the maximum is 253,060 confirmed cases.
I’m curious about which state has that large number of cases, so I’m going to print out the columns with the state names (“Province_State”) and the number of confirmed cases (“Confirmed”). From our colnames command above we can see that “Province_State” is column 1, and “Confirmed” is column 6, so we’ll use the command:
> mydata[ c(1,6) ]
The “c(1,6)” says that we want the columns 1 and 6. This command outputs
Province_State Confirmed
1 Alabama 5079
2 Alaska 321
3 American Samoa 0
4 Arizona 5068
5 Arkansas 1973
6 California 33686
7 Colorado 9730
8 Connecticut 19815
9 Delaware 2745
10 Diamond Princess 49
11 District of Columbia 2927
12 Florida 27059
13 Georgia 19407
14 Grand Princess 103
15 Guam 136
16 Hawaii 584
17 Idaho 1672
18 Illinois 31513
19 Indiana 11688
20 Iowa 3159
21 Kansas 2048
22 Kentucky 3050
23 Louisiana 24523
24 Maine 875
25 Maryland 13684
26 Massachusetts 38077
27 Michigan 32000
28 Minnesota 2470
29 Mississippi 4512
30 Missouri 5890
31 Montana 433
32 Nebraska 1648
33 Nevada 3830
34 New Hampshire 1447
35 New Jersey 88722
36 New Mexico 1971
37 New York 253060
38 North Carolina 6895
39 North Dakota 627
40 Northern Mariana Islands 14
41 Ohio 12919
42 Oklahoma 2680
43 Oregon 1957
44 Pennsylvania 33914
45 Puerto Rico 1252
46 Rhode Island 5090
47 South Carolina 4446
48 South Dakota 1685
49 Tennessee 7238
50 Texas 19751
51 Utah 3213
52 Vermont 816
53 Virgin Islands 53
54 Virginia 8990
55 Washington 12114
56 West Virginia 902
57 Wisconsin 4499
58 Wyoming 317
59 Recovered 0
Looking through, we can see that New York was the state with the largest number of cases.
Note that we could have searched for the row with the maximum number of Confirmed cases using the command:
> d2[which.max(d2$Confirmed),]
Merging Datasets
In class, we’ve been editing the original data file to add a column with the state populations (called “Population”). I have this in a separate file called “state_populations.txt” (which is also a comma separated variable file, .csv, even if not so labeled). So I’m going to import the population data:
> pop <- read.csv("state_population.txt")
Now I’ll merge the two datasets to add the population data to “mydata”.
> mydata <- merge(mydata, pop)
Graphing (Histograms and Boxplots)
With the datasets together we can try doing a histogram of the confirmed cases. Note that there is a column labeled “Confirmed” in the mydata dataset, which we’ll address as “mydata$Confirmed”:
> hist(mydata$Confirmed)
Note that on April 20th, most states had very few cases, but there were a couple with a lot of cases. It would be nice to see the data that’s clumped in the 0-50000 range broken into more bins, so we’ll add an optional argument to the hist command. The option is called breaks and we’ll request 20 breaks.
> hist(mydata$Confirmed, breaks=20)
Calculations (cases per 1000 population)
Of course, simply looking at the number of cases in not very informative because you’d expect, with all things being even, that states with the highest populations would have the highest number of cases. So let’s calculate the number of cases per capita. We’ll multiply that number by 1000 to make it more human readable:
The dataset still has a long tail, but we can see the beginnings of a normal distribution.
The next thing we can do is make a boxplot of our cases per 1000 people. I’m going to set the range option to zero so that the plot has the long tails:
> boxplot(mydata$ConfirmedPerCapita1000, range=0)
The boxplot shows, more or less, the same information in the histogram.
Finding Specific Data in the Dataset
We’d like to figure out how Missouri is doing compared to the rest of the states, so we’ll calculate the z-score, which tells how many standard deviations you are away from the mean. While there is a built in z-score function in R, we’ll first see how we can use the search and statistics methods to find the relevant information.
First, finding Missouri’s number of confirmed cases. To find all of the data in the row for Missouri we can use:
> mydata[mydata$Province_State == "Missouri",]
which gives something like this. It has all of the data but is not easy to read.
Province_State Population Country_Region Last_Update Lat
26 Missouri 5988927 US 2020-04-20 23:36:47 38.4561
Long_ Confirmed Deaths Recovered Active FIPS Incident_Rate People_Tested
26 -92.2884 5890 200 NA 5690 29 100.5213 56013
People_Hospitalized Mortality_Rate UID ISO3 Testing_Rate
26 873 3.395586 84000029 USA 955.942
Hospitalization_Rate ConfirmedPerCapita1000
26 14.82173 0.9834817
To extract just the “Confirmed” cases, we’ll add that to our command like so:
To follow up on the introduction to Logic Gates post, this assignment is intended to help students practice using functions and logic statements.
Write a set of function that act as logic gates. That is, they take in one or two inputs, and gives a single true or false output based on the truth tables. Write functions for all 8 logic gates in the link. An example python program with a function for an AND gate (the function is named myAND) is given in the glowscript link below.
Write a function that uses these functions to simulate an half-adder circuit. Create a truth table for the input and output.
Write a function that uses the gate functions to simulate a full-adder circuit. Create a truth table for the input and output.
Logic gates are the building blocks of computers. The gates in the figure above take one or two inputs (A and B) and give different results based on the type of gate. Note that the last row of gates are just the opposite of the gates in the row above (NAND gives the opposite output to AND).
As an example, two gates, an AND and an XOR, can be used to make a half-adder circuit
By feeding in the four different combinations of inputs for A and B ([0, 0], [1, 0], [0, 1], and [1, 1]) you can see how these two gates add the two numbers in binary.
I find this to be an excellent introduction to how computers work and why they’re in binary.
Are the elements of larger atoms harder to melt than those of smaller atoms?
We can investigate this type of question if we assume that bigger atoms have more protons (larger atomic number), and compare the atomic number to the properties of the elements.
Your job is to use the data linked above to draw a graph to show the relationship between Atomic Number of the element and the property you are assigned.
Question 2.
What is the relationship between the number of valence electrons of the elements in the data table and the property you were assigned.
Bonus Question
Bonus 1: The atomic number can be used as a proxy for the size of the element because it gives the number of protons, but it’s not a perfect proxy. What is the relationship between the atomic number and the atomic mass of the elements?
These atom boards worked very well for practicing how to interpret atomic symbols. The protons (blue) and electrons (red) are magnetic so they snap into place quite satisfyingly. Their poles are oriented so that the electrons will only attach properly to the slots in the electron shells and the protons only attach the right way up to the nucleus. The neutrons are wooden and non-magnetic.
Procedure for Building an Atom
Nucleus
Step 1: Number of protons (+ charge).
The number of protons is given by the element name. Carbon will always have six protons, Hydrogen will have one proton. I have students memorize the first twenty elements in the correct order, so they can quickly determine the atomic (proton) number.
14C: Protons = 6+
Step 2: Number of neutrons.
Neutrons = atomic mass – number of protons
The atomic mass is given at the top left corner of the atomic symbol: 14 in the example above for 14C.
14C: Neutrons = 14 – 6 = 8
Electron Shells
Step 3: Number of electrons (- charge).
Electrons = number of protons – charge
The charge is given to the top right of the atomic symbol. In this case, there is no charge
14C: Electrons = 6 + 0 = 6
Step 4: Electron Shells
Electrons go in shells around the nucleus.
Start with the smallest shell, fill it, and then add the next shell until you’ve placed all of the electrons.
The first shell can hold only 2 electrons, the second shell can hold 8, and the third 8. The electron configuration tells how many electrons are in each shell.
14C: Electron configuration: 2-4
They’ve also turned out to be useful when explaining ionic bonding. Since it’s easy to add or remove electron shells, you can clearly show how many electrons can be donated or received to figure out how many atoms are involved in the reactions.